NASH marriages 1860-1870 Victoria Australia :: FamilyTreeCircles.com Genealogy
<< Previous - Next >>

NASH marriages 1860-1870 Victoria Australia

Journal by tonkin

NASH marriages 1860-1870 Victoria Australia.

NASH (males)


Thomas Adams
married: 1860 Kate Davis GILL.

Maurice
married: 1861 Bridget GLEESON.

Albert Stewart
married: 1861 Sarah Isabella BARTON.

William
married: 1861 Mary Jane MORTIMER.

Michael
married: 1862 Margaret SULLIVAN.

William
married: 1863 Emma BARLOW.

John
married: 1863 Hannah KENNY.

John
married: 1864 Mary Ann Teresa SIMPSON.

Edmund
married: 1864 Catherine OMALEY.

Charles
married: 1864 Mary Ann LOOKER.

William
married: 1865 Ann CARR.

William
married: 1865 Ann CASEY.

Thomas
married: 1866 Sophia FOX.

James
married: 1867 Margaret ROSS.

William
married: 1867 Maria Annie DALY.

William
married: 1868 Katherine Louisa MILLER.

John
married: 1869 Susannah POYNTON.

Robert
married: 1870 Bridget OGORMAN.

Edmund Charles
married: 1870 Isabella MACDONALD.

Joseph George
married: 1870 Susan WOODS.

NASH (females)

Sarah
married: 1859 William WHITTIKER.

Ellen
married: 1860 Daniel CONNELL.

Elizabeth
married: 1860 Thomas Edward BILSTON.

Frances Sarah
married: 1861 Henry GRIFFIN.

Harriett Annie
married: 1862 George BENSON.

Bridget
married: 1862 Terence KEENAN.

Maria Louisa
married: 1862 Lewis SCANLON.

Sarah
married: 1863 George HASKINGS.

Margaret Helena
married: 1863 Edward BUCKLEY.

Harriet
married: 1863 Thomas Mark PILLAR.

Eliza
married: 1863 Richard KENT.

Bridget
married: 1865 Richard MOORE.

Sarah
married: 1866 John FELMENTE.

Anna Matilda
married: 1868 Charles LONG.

Elizabeth Jane
married: 1869 Samuel BRIERLY.

Louisa
married: 1870 Henry NEVILL.

Henrietta
married: 1870 James John LEWIS.

Compiled from the Victorian Marriage Indexes to assist others researching the NASH lines.

JN 50272

by tonkin Profile | Research | Contact | Subscribe | Block this user
on 2012-08-23 00:44:32

tonkin lives in Victoria, Australia.
Please note:
Journals are intended to assist new members locate family lines in Australia and should only be used as a guide for follow up research and record searches as intended. Due to spelling and informant errors appearing in the records, typo errors and my misreading of the records mistakes must be expected. Errors will be corrected when detected or advised.

Do you know someone who can help? Share this:

Comments

Register or Sign in to comment on this journal.