COX.— At Islington, London, on the 22nd of October, at an advanced age, Mr. James Cox, father of Messrs. William and Henry Cox, of Norwood, South Australia. COX— At Islington, in the 76th year of his age, Mr. James Cox, own father of Messrs. James and George Cox, brickmakers, Norwood, greatly respected by all who knew him. The South Australian Weekly Chronicle 17th december 1864 p.2
POLICE COURT. Adelaide: Friday, February 25. [Before Mr. S^Beddome, P.M.] Mary Cox, wife or George Cox, of Norwood, brickmaker, was charged, on remand, with maliciously wounding Mary King, wife of John King, on February 11. Mr. Smith for. the defence. On a former occasion the evidence given was to the effect that a dog belonging to informant had gone upon defendant's roof, when she (defendant) came out and struck the dog with a line-prop. On being remonstrated with she took a log and hit informant on the head, injuring her severely. Mrs. King said that she had been obliged to go to the Hospital again on the previous day, when the wound on her head had broken out, and she had lost much blood, as the doctors had much difficulty in staying the flow. Witness was cross-examined by Mr. Smith, but her evidence remained unshaken. Defendant was committed to the Supreme Court for trial, Mr. Beddome informing her that as soon as he saw that Mrs. King was out of danger he would admit her to bail. Adelaide Observer 4th March 1876 p.4
Do you have any other info, birth year, parents, where born, marriages etc
COX.— At Islington, London, on the 22nd of October, at
an advanced age, Mr. James Cox, father of Messrs. William
and Henry Cox, of Norwood, South Australia.
COX— At Islington, in the 76th year of his age, Mr.
James Cox, own father of Messrs. James and George Cox,
brickmakers, Norwood, greatly respected by all who knew
him.
The South Australian Weekly Chronicle 17th december 1864 p.2
POLICE COURT.
Adelaide: Friday, February 25.
[Before Mr. S^Beddome, P.M.]
Mary Cox, wife or George Cox, of Norwood,
brickmaker, was charged, on remand, with
maliciously wounding Mary King, wife of John
King, on February 11. Mr. Smith for. the
defence. On a former occasion the evidence
given was to the effect that a dog belonging to
informant had gone upon defendant's roof, when
she (defendant) came out and struck the dog
with a line-prop. On being remonstrated with
she took a log and hit informant on the head,
injuring her severely. Mrs. King said that she
had been obliged to go to the Hospital again on
the previous day, when the wound on her head
had broken out, and she had lost much blood,
as the doctors had much difficulty in staying the
flow. Witness was cross-examined by Mr. Smith,
but her evidence remained unshaken. Defendant
was committed to the Supreme Court for trial,
Mr. Beddome informing her that as soon as he
saw that Mrs. King was out of danger he
would admit her to bail.
Adelaide Observer 4th March 1876 p.4