Re James Conrad North Carolina USA Ipetty29322
After ( 3 years 9 months ) I felt you deserve all the assistance we can give you . The following is not an accurate documentation . ( Its about 95 % ) the reason is " no Father of James W Conrad " I don't know what the (W ) means. I need to digress and with respect, & try and show you possibly the reasons you were unable to progress in your search . Although this is not much , to find the ancestors of " James " is very difficult . I have gone back and come forward , and this may be the best starting point on the ancestry you are searching for that you may ever get .Let me know if this does assist you . If it doesn't just throw it in the can and we'll have another go When looking at this document, do it slow, it tells a story ' and one we may never find the answer to . OK here we go .
( a ) James W Conrad's mother was only ( 15 ) when she had her
(1st ) child " George " What happened to the father ????
( b ) he must have still been alive some where as " Elizabeth " ( no surname found at all after much research )Perhaps she was told to leave her families Home ?? and kept contact with him . He wasn't Dead .Was he married to someone else and elizabeth his mistress ???? .
( c ) The father ( the unknown Conrad ) must have been still around as she named ( 5 ) children after him ( this might not be so ) we have no way of proving it except ,They are registered with the Conrad
surname
( 4 ) I can find no names of her father or mother and what I did find I couldn't back it up with proof . Their is a possibility that her parents disowned her for the above reasons . On the other hand .WE don't Know !!!
( 5 ) James W conrad did marry Elizabeth ( M ) Finney- 30th March 1858
Haywood North Carolina
Jame's and his Mothers Family
Elizabeth (AFN:1SLV-4HW) ( no surname ????? )
Born: Abt 1805
Place: North Carolina
Father:
Mother:
Children
1. Sex Name
M George W CONARD (AFN:1SLV-4J4)
Born: Abt 1820
Place: North Carolina
2. Sex Name
M John A CONARD (AFN:1SLV-4KB)
Born: Abt 1827
Place: North Carolina
3. Sex Name
M James W CONARD (AFN:1SLV-4LJ)
Born: Abt 1830
Place: North Carolina
4. Sex Name
F Caty CONARD (AFN:1SLV-4MQ)
Born: Abt 1840
Place: North Carolina
5. Sex Name
M Harvey CONARD (AFN:1SLV-4NX)
Born: Abt 1840
Place: North Carolina
After 3yrs etc I hope this will assist you in some way
Till we meet again -Regards -edmondsallan
Before I retired, when I was a mechanic for Piedmont Airlines/USAir/US Airways, at INT/Winston-Salem, N.C.; my lead mechanic was E. R. Conrad of an old family there, but I never heard him talk about it. I will subscribe to your interesting newsletter as I'm interested in the search process; but know little about it. I have a seemingly secure computer-to-computer communication concept that is so simple, so logical; I can't understand why it is not in use by everybody? There must be a defect in it's logic that alludes me? Except three premises as true; when plain-text is mixed, that is enciphered with a string of true random numbers (not generated by mathematics), and it is never again re-used with plain-text, even if intercepted, it can not be decripted. Such random numbers were once used by spies on "flash pads"; random number strings printed on paper impregnated with gun-powder, so they can be quickly destroyed. Premise two: strings of such random numbers can be generated within a computer by a safe speck of uranium with a detector; in the days of paper-tapes, two were punched at the same time with one safely retained; the other physically delivered to embassies. When two different random number strings are mixed, enciphered and transmitted, one of them safely can be re-used provided; it is never used to send plain-text messages; and never used with other random number strings sent that are intended for future plain-text use. Your computer and my computer each have specks of uranium in them to generate random number strings. I generate a string on a CD to safely physically deliver to you, while retaining my copy on my hard drive. I generate another, different random number string; mix, that is encipher it, with the existing one on my hard drive that you now have on yours; and send you the two combined random number strings. It does not matter if the transmission is intercepted. Received, you strip-out the re-usable carrier-only string, and save it for an added return random number string, generated from your speck of uranium. The other new random string from me, you mix with your new plain-text return message to me. Received, I strip-out, discard, and never re-use the carrier random number string you sent; and read your resulting plain-text message. If we leave both computers always-on with a constant, consistent flow of traffic; when plain-text messages aren't being sent, we send each other new random number strings for future plain-text use. Too much of that stored; we dump the surplus. Logically (I think?) every home computer can safely, securely send such, even if intercepted. Right or wrong? If wrong, where did my logic fail? Jim/focsoninfinity, Southport, North Carolina, USA. I've long used Copernic as a search engine, but found a far better, also free one. I forget the name, but if you e-mail me; I'll find it's name and e-mail you the download website.
I found james married to elizabeth beasley