Thomas Frederick Tudor kills his illegitimate son. :: Genealogy
<< Previous - Next >>

Thomas Frederick Tudor kills his illegitimate son.

Journal by janilye

Thomas Frederick TUDOR was born in Newcastle, New South Wales in 1870. He was one of thirteen children born to Thomas TUDOR an immigrant born Staffordshire, England in 1829 and his wife Ellen nee WILLIAMSON born 1834 in Fifeshire, Scotland.
In 1898, 18 year old Thomas Frederick had a son to miss Emma May Ashton, She named the baby Albert Cyril ASHTON and Thomas Frederick paid his 5 shillings a week support for the infant.
Emma and the baby lived with her parents and Thomas made the occassional visit.
One evening Thomas arrived at Emma's house at Catherine Hill Bay and he, Emma and the then 9 month old Albert walked down to the boathouse to spend some time together. They laid the baby down on the floor of the boathouse where according to his mother the child fell asleep on a blanket. After about half an hour they headed back to the house it was dark and the baby began coughing and crying. Thomas lit a match to see what was wrong with the infant and they both noticed the baby's face was green.
Emma took the child inside the house and Thomas went home. The child became worse and Emma woke her mother. The mother gave the baby butter as an emetic but the child continued to cry and was obviously in pain. They sent for the doctor but by the time he arrived the next morning the child was dead.
The doctor performed an autopsy and declared the baby had been poisoned with Paris Green. Paris green was a mixture of copper and arsenic which was used as a rat poison and it is also a pigment which was used in paint. Emma declared Thomas had poisoned her baby because he didn't want to pay child support.
An inquest was held and the jury declared the child died from wilful poisoning. Thomas was arrested and committed for trial. The newspapers all over Australia ran headlines declaring Thomas Frederick TUDOR charged with poisoning his illegitimate son.
Thomas's popular and well respected family were held up to ridicule.The trial was held at the Sydney Criminal Court on 14 June 1899 and the jury disagreed on the verdict, so the judge ordered a retrial.
The second trial was held at Maitland Circuit Court on 27 September 1899. Thomas pleaded his innocence and the jury returned a verdict of not guilty.
Although Thomas was free, there was still the matter of the baby being poisoned and the population was divided over the issue.

Today, of course we don't use Paris Green in our dyes or paints.
And fishermen no longer paint their boats and boathouse floors with it to keep the barnacles away.


The Children of Thomas Tudor and Ellen nee WILLIAMSON:-
Ellen Tudor 1855 ? 1860
Mary Tudor 1856 ? 1861
Thomas Tudor 1858 ? 1860
Robert Henry Tudor 1860 ? 1861
Ann Jane Tudor 1862 ? 1864
George Henry Tudor 1864 ? 1912
Adelaide Tudor 1866 ? 1945
Blondon Tudor 1868 ?
Thomas Frederick Tudor 1870 ? ????????
Robert Ernest Tudor 1872 ? 1948
Albert Hamilton Tudor 1874 ? 1877
Alice Felecia Tudor 1877 ? 1939
Blanche Tudor 1880 ? 1880

Viewed: 2210 times
Likes: 0
by janilye Profile | Research | Contact | Subscribe | Block this user
on 2011-02-25 11:05:38

janilye - 7th generation, Convict stock. Born in New South Wales now living in Victoria, carrying, with pride 'The Birthstain'.

Do you know someone who can help? Share this:


user edmondsallan deactivated
by rosiemckenzie on 2018-05-22 08:33:52

My name is Rose-Marie McKenzie and Emma Mary Ashton was my Grandmother. My Father, Harry Oswald Evans was born to Emma Ashton and Henry Evans in 1915 in the Locomotive Hotel Hunter Street Newcastle. I have researched the above story of Thomas Frederick Tudor accused of murdering baby Albert Cyril Ashton and have copies of the transcripts covering the court case from the Newcastle Morning Herald and I'd like to correct a couple of details from the above article. Tudor travelled to Toronto to meet Emma, where she lived with her parents and that's where the poisoning took place in a boatshed on the lakefront in Toronto, not Catherine Hill Bay as stated above. He would have been 28 years old not 18 and Emma was 19 years old. I find it very hard to believe that Tudor was found not guilty and the murder of Albert and very sad that the murderer was never found.

Register or Sign in to comment on this journal.